Difference between revisions of "Peacekeeping Forces of Urth"

Revision as of 20:52, 28 April 2017

Peacekeeping Forces of Urth
Flag of PK-FU
Date of Creation
Location of PK-FU Headquarters
April 23, 2017
McLendal, Furnifold

History of The PeaceKeeping Forces of Urth

The PK-FU was created when 4 nations' decided to help save civilians and see peace across the world in war-torn regions. The current and first operation of the PK-FU is in Osnek, Latianburg after the nuclear attack on it. The drafting and ratification of the formation of the PK-FU was done in the Furnifold capital city of McLendal. Additonally, the headquarters of the PK-FU will be built and finished there in a couple months. Soon after the creation of the PK-FU, the Second Republic of Tretrid and the Oan Isles applied for membership in the PK-FU and were accepted.

PK Constitution etc.2013

• Article 1-1: All Founding Members have the power to eject a member from the organization without going through the SC,RC,GA if the member in question was found to violate PK Human Rights.

1b. Any member that abuses there authority will be brought in front General Assembly and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent.

1c.The PK forces are not to be used during Military conflicts as a military branch at any time. PK forces can only be called into action during a war for the Following Reasons.

-The PK-FU can have control of a DMZ for up to 15 years.

-During civil wars

-Human rights abuse during war

-To bring peace to a certain area(Green Zones) during a conflict but cannot engage in offensive warfare.

• 1.2 Human Rights

International human rights law is an integral part of the normative frame- work FOR Urth peacekeeping operations. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which sets the cornerstone of international human rights standards, emphasizes that human rights and fundamental freedoms are universal and guaranteed to everybody. Urth peacekeeping operations should be conducted in full respect of human rights and should seek to advance human rights through the implementation of their mandates .

Urth peacekeeping personnel – whether military, police or civilian – should act in accordance with international human rights law and under- stand how the implementation of their tasks intersects with human rights. Peacekeeping personnel should strive to ensure that they do not become perpetrators of human rights abuses. They must be able to recognize human rights violations or abuse, and be prepared to respond appropriately within the limits of their mandate and their competence. Urth peacekeeping personnel should respect human rights in their dealings with colleagues and with local people, both in their public and in their private lives. Where they commit abuses, they should be held accountable.

• 1.3 International Humanitarian Law

International humanitarian law is known also as “the law of war” or “the law of armed conflict,” and restricts the means and methods of armed conflict. International humanitarian law is contained in the four Urth Conventions of 1960 and their two Additional Protocols of 1999, as well as in rules regulating the means and methods of combat. International humanitarian law also includes conventions and treaties on the protection of cultural property and the environment during armed conflict, as well as protection of victims of conflict. International humanitarian law is designed to protect persons who do not participate, or are no longer participating, in the hostilities; and it maintains the fundamental rights of civilians, victims and non-combatants in an armed conflict. It is relevant to Urth peacekeeping operations because these missions are often deployed into post-conflict environments where violence may be ongoing or conflict could reignite. Additionally, in post-conflict environments there are often large civilian populations that have been targeted by the warring parties, prisoners of war and other vulnerable groups to whom the Urth Conventions or other humanitarian law would apply in the event of further hostilities. Urth peacekeepers must have a clear understanding of the principles and rules of international humanitarian law and observe them in situations where they apply.

• 1.4 Security Council Mandates

Urth peacekeeping operations are deployed on the basis of a mandate from the PK-FU Security Council. The tasks that a Urth peacekeeping operation will be required to perform are set out in the Security Council mandate. Security Council mandates differ from situation to situation, depending on the nature of the conflict and the specific challenges it presents. Since PK-FU peacekeeping operations are normally deployed to support the implementation of a ceasefire or a more comprehensive peace agreement, Security Council mandates are influenced by the nature and content of the agreement reached by the parties to the conflict. Security Council mandates also reflect the broader normative debates shaping the international environment. In this regard, there are a number of cross-cutting, thematic tasks that are regularly assigned to PK-FU peacekeeping operations on the basis of the following landmark Security Council resolutions:

-Security Council resolution 1891(2012) on women, peace and security;2

-Security Council resolution 1670(2013) on children and armed conflict;3

-Security Council resolution 1589 (2014) on the protection of civilians in armed conflict;4

The range of tasks assigned to Urth peacekeeping operations has expanded significantly in response to shifting patterns of conflict and to best address emerging threats to international peace and security. Although each Urth peacekeeping operation is different, there is a considerable degree of consistency in the types of mandated tasks assigned by the Security Council that will be said when 2nd Part comes out Later.

Purpose of the PeaceKeeping Forces of Urth

The PK-FU's main goal is to help civilians in times of conflict, improve quality of life in war-torn/impoverished regions, and protect the process of peace negotiations.

How the PK-FU Functions

The PK-FU is run by a council consisting of all of its member nations to vote on the apporvation or negation on PK operations. In order for an operation to be approved or negated, the operation must have 3/4 of the council members voting FOR or AGAINST the operation. If there is no 3/4, the stalemate will be discussed in council.

Member Nations of the PK-FU

• Republic of Xagrurg (founding nation)
• Republic of Furnifold (founding nation)
• Federation of Kuthernburg (founding nation)
• Commonwealth of Latianburg (founding nation)
• Second Republic of Tretrid
• The Oan Isles
• Blueacia

Amount of Funding Given To The PK-FU

Total: 1.62 billion Kirib

Individual Nations:

• Latianburg: 40 million Kirib
• Kuthernburg: 98 million Kirib
• Furnifold: 2.3 million Kirib
• Oan Isles: 1.25 billion Kirib
• Tretrid: 60 million Kirib
• Xagrurg: 148 million Kirib

Amount of Peacekeepers of Each Nation

• Xagrurg: active troops- 5,000; total: 11,000
• Tretrid: active troops: 7,500; total: 17,500
• Latianburg: active troops: 1,700; total: 9,700
• Kuthernburg: active troops: 2,300; total: 9,600
• Furnifold: active troops: 3,050; total: 8,567
• Oan Isles: active troops: none; total: none