Difference between revisions of "Talk:Solar System"

From NSWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Suggesting Deletion of This Page)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I am not really sure there needs to be a "solar system" thread here on nswiki. It is my understanding that the general rule is that where a wikipedia page will suffice, a nswiki page is unnecessary. Nothing in this wiki page really seems all that informative to me -- all it states is general propositions, along with facts that exist in the real wiki page for the solar system. I would suggest we delete this page.
 
I am not really sure there needs to be a "solar system" thread here on nswiki. It is my understanding that the general rule is that where a wikipedia page will suffice, a nswiki page is unnecessary. Nothing in this wiki page really seems all that informative to me -- all it states is general propositions, along with facts that exist in the real wiki page for the solar system. I would suggest we delete this page.
 +
:There is no such rule. As long as an RL topic can be made more relevant to NS with an NSwiki article, it is perfectly fine. This one does contain some NS-exclusive facts, but as with any article, it can always be expanded or improved upon. --[[User:Omigodtheykilledkenny|Omigodtheykilledkenny]] ([[User talk:Omigodtheykilledkenny|talk]]) 11:00, 26 January 2016 (EST)

Latest revision as of 12:00, 26 January 2016

I am not really sure there needs to be a "solar system" thread here on nswiki. It is my understanding that the general rule is that where a wikipedia page will suffice, a nswiki page is unnecessary. Nothing in this wiki page really seems all that informative to me -- all it states is general propositions, along with facts that exist in the real wiki page for the solar system. I would suggest we delete this page.

There is no such rule. As long as an RL topic can be made more relevant to NS with an NSwiki article, it is perfectly fine. This one does contain some NS-exclusive facts, but as with any article, it can always be expanded or improved upon. --Omigodtheykilledkenny (talk) 11:00, 26 January 2016 (EST)